top of page

Notícias

Buscar

Atualizado: 13 de jan. de 2023

ABSTRACT

The “Blue Economy” has been identified as a driver of European growth, through the development of new competences and activities that enable a sustainable exploitation of ocean resources. Strategies and policies were formulated, to achieve these goals. Research and innovation, aiming at the revitalisation of established sectors and the development of emerging industries as well as at a better understanding of the marine environment and the requirements for its preservation were key elements of these strategies.

The strategies and policies defined at EU level had a strong impact upon the formulation of the Portuguese National Ocean Strategy 2013-2020 and the associated Mar-Portugal Action Plan. The central goal was to enable the country to recover its “national maritime identity” and regain a position in this area, by increasing the contribution of maritime sectors to the domestic product, strengthening the scientific and technological capacity, and stimulating the development of new fields.

The objective of this paper is analyse the directions followed by the research and technology development activities conducted by Portuguese organisations in the areas encompassed by the Blue Economy, in order to conduct a first assessment of the effectiveness of the strategic orientations defined. In particular, we seek to understand:

a) which areas appear to have been privileged and thus are likely to be developing faster, and which are the main gaps; which is the relative importance of new areas vs. advances targeting established ones;

b) the position of different types of actors in the developments taking place, namely to what extent they involve companies; the role played by new technology intensive companies in developing new technologies and products and/or in linking between research and industry.

For this purpose, the paper analyses the research and technology development (RTD) activities conducted by Portuguese organisations in the context of projects funded under the Horizon 2020 European Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020). Using the Community Research and Development Information Service (CORDIS), we identified and collected information on the 136 projects with Portuguese participation related with the Blue Economy and on their participants. The projects were classified according to the priority areas defined in the Portuguese Strategy and Action-Plan, in order to assess their position relatively to them.

The analysis of the projects shows a heterogeneous picture (cf. Table 1). The results indicate an important investment, in particular by research organisations, in “system structuring” activities, i.e. the development of knowledge about the marine resources and marine environment, as well as about the impacts of human activity and ways to reduced or remediate them. This was identified as a gap in the national strategy and is critical for the sustainable exploitation of the ocean. They also show that activities targeting industrial activity are mostly concentrated in the exploitation of living resources and in marine energies. In the first case, by attempting to revitalise established industries (e.g. fish capture and transformation) namely through research investment in aquaculture. But also by investing in a new area – marine biotechnology – with a variety of application sectors (e.g. fisheries, health, environment). In the second case, by strengthening the investment made in marine renewable energies in the last decades.

Concerning organisations positioning (cf. Table 2), results show the central role of research organisations that not only dominate in structural activities but are often part of mixed teams in application-oriented projects. They also point to an important role of new technology intensive companies (e.g. active in biotechnology, instrumentation, underwater robotics and materials), particularly in areas that require development of more application-oriented methods, products, services. A similar role is played in some areas by a few other technology-oriented companies, often large firms. These two types of firms are often part of mixed teams with research organisations and, in a few cases, with established companies from user sectors. But the participation of this latter group is very limited.

The analysis was mostly focused on Portuguese organisations. However, the majority of projects also involved organisations from other countries, which were the main actors in some of them. In this broader context, Portuguese organisations could profit from the interaction with reputed foreign partners, namely in areas where new competence was being acquired. Thus, the areas targeted by these projects were also areas where the development of country capabilities in Blue Economy fields could reap the benefits from international research cooperation, which potentially contributed to broadening knowledge bases and extending international networks.

These results can be relevant for policy makers, providing some indications on the relative success of policies for the development of a Blue Economy in Portugal and signalling the areas that still require greater attention.

Table 1 - EU projects by priority areas

Table 2 - Project teams by priority area


KEYWORDS

Blue economy; Policy Strategies; Innovation System; Research & Development; New Technology Intensive Firms

 

Sousa, C., Conceição, O. and Fontes, M. (2020) Creating a Blue Economy: Research and innovation partnerships to accelerate the development of ocean-related industries, oral presentation at Workshop Dinâmicas Socioeconómicas e Territoriais Contemporâneas V, 21-22 Janeiro 2020, DINAMIA’CET-IUL, Lisboa.

 

Programa _Workshop DINAMIA
.pdf
Fazer download de PDF • 204KB

D'C 2020_Cristina
.pptx
Fazer download de PPTX • 3.03MB

169 visualizações0 comentário

Astract

New technologies are necessary to address climate change, but their development and implementation can have different impacts on decarbonizing the energy system and transforming the economy. This work adds to previous efforts to conceptualize how technology innovation influences industrial change (Fontes et al., 2019; Dolata, 2009). The transformative capacity of new technologies depends on technological characteristics as well as contextual variables (Bergek et al., 2015), as shown, for example, in the case of Marine Renewable Energy Technologies or MRET (Fontes et al., 2019). The context influences the development of complementary interactions with existing industries, which are critical to access key resources and markets, but this requires organizational and institutional changes that remain little understood (Markard and Hoffman, 2016). Hence, this study aims to address the following question: Which are the conditions that enable a new technology to involve the largest number of sectors and induce their transformation? In particular: Which factors lead firms to engage with new technology innovation?

The conceptual framework combines contributions from the sustainable transitions literature with those from economic complexity, economic geography, and strategic management. This comprises research on firm diversification into related activities (Laurens et al., 2018), investigation that extends the concept of relatedness beyond technology to encompass other competences (Neffke and Hening, 2013; Tanner, 2014), research on how regions diversify into new industries (Martin and Sunley, 2016; Fornahl et al, 2012), and the debate on the role of related/unrelated diversification in new path creation (Boschma, 2017; Janssen and Frenken, 2019).

We derive a set of hypothesis concerning the factors that influence firms’ decisions to engage with the new technologies. Thus, the propensity to enter into the new field is expected to be higher:

H1. When firms belong to sectors that are associated with the development of the technology and are identified as the core complementary sectors (Hidalgo et al., 2007);

H2. When firms are from sectors that are less proximate to the technology, but that provide competencies and resources that enable the full operation of complex technologies (Fontes et al., 2019);

H3. When firms display characteristics that have been shown to make them more likely to engage in diversification (Laurens et al, 2018): greater dimension, higher technological competence, greater innovation capacity.

The empirical research addresses the case of wave energy and offshore wind in Portugal, focusing on the firms from sectors that can contribute with competences and resources to their development (Scheme 1). Firms were identified through: i) secondary sources, firms involved in MRET as partners or suppliers in experimental projects; ii) a questionnaire targeting firms from sectors identified as potential contributors to the development, production, installation and operation of MRET (OTEO, 2014). This provided a set of firms with different attitudes towards MRET. The objective was to uncover the determinants of firms’ decision to become involved in the development of these new technologies. For this purpose we collected data on firms’ characteristics, sector of activity and innovation capacity from a variety of databases (e.g. Amadeus, Cordis, ANI, EspaceNet). In addition we created a new variable “complementarity” which indicates whether the firm’s sector of activity is among the core sectors defined for MRET (cf. Wind, 2009).

We used standard binary logit regressions to estimate the effect of a set of determinants in the decision of firms to develop activities in MRET (see Appendix 1 and Table 1). Graph 1 shows actual and predicted impacts on activity for four key variables. The variable “complementarity” is negative and statistically significant, meaning that firms from sectors unrelated to core sectors are 2.6 to 3.7 times more likely to become involved in MRET. This result confirms hypothesis 2 while refuting hypothesis 1. On the other hand, firms more technologically advanced (“Medium to High technology”) and participating in national research projects are significantly less likely to participate in the development of MRET. However, the probability slightly increases for larger companies and for those that have not low technological content. These results partially validate hypothesis 3.

Therefore it appears to be unnecessary to have a high technology content and strong innovation capacity to engage with the emerging MRET, and potentially benefit the opportunities for change this entails (Fontes et al., 2019). These opportunities may be open to firms from traditional sectors, providing that they have a certain dimension, which gives them conditions for engaging in product or market diversification. The research also finds that these firms are often likely to be active in sectors that are not part of the “complementary core”. This suggests that technologies that have more significant transformative potential have an impact that goes beyond sectors with greater proximity to the technology. It is now necessary to further confirm these results and explore them in greater depth, namely to better understand the importance of unrelated diversification.


Keywords: system transformation, relatedness, diversification, energy technologies.


References:

Bergek, A., Hekkert, M., Jacobsson, S., Markard, J., Sandén, B., & Truffer, B. (2015). Technological innovation systems in contexts: Conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16, 51-64.

Boschma, R., Coenen, L. Frenken, K. & Truffer, B. (2017) Towards a theory of regional diversification: combining insights from Evolutionary Economic Geography and Transition Studies, Regional Studies 51: 31-45.

Dolata, U. (2009). Technological innovations and sectoral change: Transformative capacity, adaptability, patterns of change: An analytical framework. Research Policy, 38(6), 1066-1076.

Fontes M., Bento N., Andersen A.D. (2019), Unleashing the transformative potential of innovations: context, complementarities and competition, Proceedings of the 10th International Sustainability Transitions Conference, Ottawa, Canada, June 23-26.

Fornahl, D., Hassink, R., Klaerding. K., Mossig, I. and Schröder, H. (2012) From the old path of shipbuilding onto the new path of offshore wind energy? The case of northern Germany. European Planning Studies 20:835–55.

Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabási, A. L., & Hausmann, R. (2007). The product space conditions the development of nations. Science, 317(5837), 482-487.

Janssen, M. and Frenken, K. (2019) Cross-specialisation policy: rationales and options for linking unrelated industries, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 12(2): 195–212.

Laurens, P., Le Bas, C. and Lhuillery, S. (2018), Firm Specialization in Clean Energy Technologies: The Influence of Path Dependence and Technological Diversification, Revue d’Economie Industrielle, Vol. 164, available at:https://doi.org/10.4000/rei.7625.

Markard, J., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2016). Analysis of complementarities: Framework and examples from the energy transition. Technological forecasting and social change, 111, 63-75.

Martin, R., and Sunley P. (2006) Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 395–437.

Neffke, F. and Henning, M. (2013) Skill relatedness and firm diversification, Strategic Management Journal, 34: 297–316 (2013

OTEO (2014) Offshore Renewable Energy–Current Status and Future Perspectives for Portugal. Observatório Tecnológico para as Energias Offshore, INEGI, Porto.

Tanner, A. N. (2014) Regional Branching Reconsidered: Emergence of the Fuel Cell Industry in European Regions, Economic Geography 90(4): 403–427.

Vona, F. (2019). Job losses and political acceptability of climate policies: why the ‘job-killing’ argument is so persistent and how to overturn it. Climate Policy, 19(4), 524-532.

Wind, I. (2009). HS Codes and the Renewable Energy Sector. Research and Analysis, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD), <https://www.ictsd.org › files › downloads › 2009/09>

Scheme 1. Structure of the research.




Graph 1. Observed and predicted effects of key variables in Activity


 

Bento, N., Fontes, M. and Barbosa, J. (2020) How innovations attract actors: Insights from 20 years of experimenting with marine energy renewable technologies in Portugal, oral presentation at Workshop Dinâmicas Socioeconómicas e Territoriais Contemporâneas V, 21-22 Janeiro 2020, DINAMIA’CET-IUL, Lisboa.

 

Programa do Workshop:

Programa _Workshop DINAMIA
.pdf
Fazer download de PDF • 204KB

How innovation attract innovators_20Jan'
.
Fazer download de • 789KB

70 visualizações0 comentário

Webinar


At this webinar we discuss about the technological policies that better promote the decarbonisation of the economy by 2050 as a response to the climate emergency and the international commitments, with examples in the development of marine renewable energies.


Keywords: diffusion of innovations, technological innovation systems, sustainable transitions, decarbonisation, technological policies

 
Diffusion and decarbonization PT_P2M_Mis
.
Fazer download de • 1.18MB

79 visualizações0 comentário
bottom of page